Most academic papers are not rejected because the research is weak. They are rejected because the argument is unclear, the writing is harder to follow than it needs to be, or the contribution is buried under unnecessary complexity.
By the time you reach the editing stage, you are usually too close to your work to see these problems clearly. You know the literature, the methods, and the results so well that your brain fills in gaps automatically. What feels obvious to you may be confusing or underdeveloped to a reviewer.
Editing is not about polishing sentences for the sake of it. It is about making your thinking visible to someone who does not live inside your project.
Below are five practical editing techniques to help you regain distance from your draft, sharpen your academic writing, clarify your argument, and submit your paper with confidence.
1. Change the font to spot errors more easily
When you have been looking at the same document for weeks or months, your brain stops reading the words and starts recognising patterns. That is why spelling mistakes, missing words, and grammar errors can survive multiple rounds of proofreading.
One simple way to interrupt this is to change the font.
Choose something that looks unfamiliar. It does not need to be extreme, but it should feel slightly uncomfortable to read. This forces your brain to slow down and pay attention to the text itself.
Many researchers find that as soon as they change the font, they start noticing small but important errors, including repeated words, missing punctuation, and common mistakes like there, their, and they’re.
Before you start, save a copy of the original document, just in case.
2. Read your paper backwards, sentence by sentence
This technique focuses on clarity rather than correctness.
When drafting, it is easy to write sentences that make sense in your head but not to anyone else. You know what you mean, so your brain glosses over awkward phrasing, unclear logic, or overloaded structure.
To break that habit, start at the very end of your paper and read it backwards, one sentence at a time. Ignore flow and argument for now. Ask a simple question: does this sentence make sense on its own?
Reading in reverse removes context and forces you to slow down. If a sentence is vague, confusing, or doing too much work, it becomes obvious very quickly.
3. Do a mock peer review before you submit
Once you have dealt with sentence-level issues, it is time to step back and look at the paper as a whole.
At this stage, you should be asking questions such as:
- Does the argument actually make sense?
- Are there gaps in the reasoning?
- Do the conclusions clearly follow from the data?
This matters because academic peer review takes time. If there are missing explanations or logical jumps, you want to catch them before submission rather than waiting months for a rejection or major revision.
Colleagues can help with this, but many researchers also benefit from running a structured mock peer review. Tools like Reviewer3 allow you to upload a draft and receive detailed academic feedback on study design, reproducibility, and clarity within the literature. The goal is to identify weaknesses early and strengthen your paper before submission.
4. Scan for weak or passive language
First drafts are about getting ideas onto the page. As a result, academic writing often becomes full of passive or indirect constructions that weaken the author’s voice.
Phrases such as “it was observed that” or “significant differences were found” are common, but overuse can make your writing sound cautious or vague.
Try scanning your document for weak verbs like is, was, has been, and were, especially in passive constructions. Highlight them, then decide where a sentence could be rewritten more actively.
You do not need to remove every passive sentence. The aim is simply to strengthen your tone where clarity and confidence matter most.
5. Take a proper break before final revisions
This step is essential and often overlooked.
After working through the edits above, step away from the paper completely. Not for an hour, but long enough to forget how you phrased things or structured the argument.
If you are close to a deadline, even one day can help. If you can afford it, a week or two is better. Distance allows you to read your work as a reviewer rather than as its author.
Writing a paper is mentally demanding. Without rest, it is hard to engage meaningfully with feedback or to make good editorial decisions. When you return with fresh eyes, problems that were invisible before often become obvious.
Comprehensive feedback on your research paper, thesis, or grant proposal. Trusted by thousands of researchers worldwide.
